Wednesday, April 30, 2014

The Jazz Teacher


THE TEACHER

How to learn Jazz music is  a unique decision needing individual guidelines that cater to personality styles of learning. There is no one path toward accomplishment. No single continuum that outlines the broad spectrum that is Jazz. As there is no one level of mastery. Here are some choices:
·               Transcriptions (your own) from recordings        
·               Reading published transcriptions
·               Composing from charts in Real Book, etc.
·               Listening then reproducing a teachers’ riffs:Barry Harris
·               Studying Jazz theory textbooks :An Approach to Comping                                                                    Jeb Patton
·               Private piano lessons
The levels of mastery include the above that can be summaries as functions of the brain, the eyes, the ears and the fingers. Who trains the feeling?
There is a unique challenge for adults to learn. There is also a unique challenge to the teaching of adults. When I reentered my Hanon studies more that a year ago I was not thinking of Jazz. I was hearing Mozart. I’m still hearing Mozart  even after this first year studying Jazz. I am still playing classical piano and Hanon exercises.
When Dan Kaufman sits in the front of our classroom at Jazz Mobile Saturday Workshop, it is a concession on his part having agreed to be the TEACHER.
The style and methodology he uses is non-hierarchial and interactive. One gets the sense that he is merely contributing ideas to the study of music not espounding doctrines or even theories. But that sense is a mistake.  He gives suggestions that are accurate yet terse. However, a suggestion is an invitation. This is the ambience for success. It is only after you try these suggestions that you yourself will decide whether this is a useful theory or not.
In psychotherapy the discussion is simply a mirror of the thoughts verbalized to the therapist. The therapist may say, “Is this you?”  And the therapeutic work is with what has just been said. So it is when DK teaches privately or in a classroom setting. Whatever question we ask or whatever statement or observation is made or whatever tune is performed DK works from that point forward. This is a very efficient use of a student's time.  It is a guarantee that we will get something out of this class. It is the propellent for at home study. This is no minor skill for a professor.  It is the exhibition of a broad mastery of the music called Jazz, specifically piano performance solo or ensemble. The compensation and acknowledgment of this is inversely proportional to the gift to the student's experience.
The individual quidelines for learning Jazz are constructed by what the student has mastered and is ready to progress toward. In the classroom we are at various points in this continuum. It is chaotic! Teaching requires repeating, restating and rephrasing an explanation. DK manages to describe the numerical chord structures in multiple lectures without an attitude of, "Haven't I gone over this before?" And we take notes because we always hear a little something new.
When DK  abruptly shifts to an analogy my thinking shifts too. This happens when one level of explanation is not utilized by a listening student or when a restatement is indicated. Suddenly our listening is jarred to a new location: a baseball field, for example. It maybe a brain hemispheric shift.  The movement is from a (left) linear attempt to comprehend to a (right) feeling sense of understanding.  It is a noticable change.  It makes us laugh to try to compare the 'meaty' register on the keyboard to the 'sweet spot' of a baseball bat.
After we perform a piano piece DK always asks the students, "What did you like about the piece?" before he gives his comments. He listens to us. In this classroom filled with adult students, with our large egos, DK's persona is diminutive. This bring a generous helping of creative energy into the classroom. With his comments come a precision of language. We students, on the other hand search for something profound to say; but we always say something. Then DK plays his impromtu version the piece, smothering our infantile performance. Even after he has said, "I don't know that piece."
The only time DK's countenance falters is when the facility fails to facilitate.